Magnetic Resonance - Technology Information Portal Welcome to MRI Technology
Info
  Sheets

Out-
      side
 



 
 'Image' 
SEARCH FOR    
 
  2 3 5 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
Result : Searchterm 'Image' found in 19 terms [] and 434 definitions []
previous     86 - 90 (of 453)     next
Result Pages : [1 2 3 4]  [5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... ]
Searchterm 'Image' was also found in the following services: 
spacer
News  (255)  Resources  (73)  Forum  (129)  
 
MAGNETOM™InfoSheet: - Devices -
Intro, 
Types of Magnets, 
Overview, 
etc.MRI Resource Directory:
 - Devices -
 
www.medical.siemens.com From Siemens Medical Systems;
70 cm + 125 cm + 1.5T and Tim - a combination never seen before in MRI ... MAGNETOM Espree™s unique open bore design can accommodate more types of patients than other 1.5T systems on the market today, in particular the growing population of obese patients. The power of 1.5T combined with Tim technology boosts signal to noise, which is necessary to adequately image obese patients.
Device Information and Specification
CLINICAL APPLICATION
Whole body
CONFIGURATION
Open bore
Body, Tim [32 x 8], Tim [76 coil elements with up to 18 RF channels])
SYNCHRONIZATION
ECG/peripheral: Optional/yes, respiratory gating
PULSE SEQUENCES
GRE, IR, FIR, STIR, TrueIR/FISP, FSE, FLAIR, MT, SS-FSE, MT-SE, MTC, MSE, EPI, 3D DESS//CISS/PSIF, GMR
IMAGING MODES
Single, multislice, volume study, multi angle, multi oblique
SINGLE/MULTI SLICE
Image Processor reconstructing up to 3226 images per second (256 x 256, 25% recFoV)
FOV
35 cm coronal//sagittal, 45 cm axial
Min 2D/3D: 0.1/0.05 mm
1024 x 1024 full screen display
MEASURING MATRIX
64 x 64 to 1024 x 1024
BORE DIAMETER
or W x H
70 cm diameter
MAGNET WEIGHT
3800 kg
H*W*D
? x ? x 125 cm
STRENGTH
33 mT/m
5-GAUSS FRINGE FIELD
2.5 m / 3.8 m
Passive, active
spacer
 
• Related Searches:
    • MRI Equipment
    • Device
    • Hardware
    • Open MRI
    • Superconducting Magnet
 
Further Reading:
  News & More:
First 1.5 Tesla Open Bore MRI Introduced
Tuesday, 10 August 2004   by www.hospimedica.com    
Obesity May Influence Imaging Diagnosis
Wednesday, 22 December 2004   by www.hospimedica.com    
MRI Resources 
Shielding - Societies - Directories - Mobile MRI Rental - Education - Breast MRI
 
MRI History
 
Sir Joseph Larmor (1857-1942) developed the equation that the angular frequency of precession of the nuclear spins being proportional to the strength of the magnetic field. [Larmor relationship]
In the 1930's, Isidor Isaac Rabi (Columbia University) succeeded in detecting and measuring single states of rotation of atoms and molecules, and in determining the mechanical and magnetic moments of the nuclei.
Felix Bloch (Stanford University) and Edward Purcell (Harvard University) developed instruments, which could measure the magnetic resonance in bulk material such as liquids and solids. (Both honored with the Nobel Prize for Physics in 1952.) [The birth of the NMR spectroscopy]
In the early 70's, Raymond Damadian (State University of New York) demonstrated with his NMR device, that there are different T1 relaxation times between normal and abnormal tissues of the same type, as well as between different types of normal tissues.
In 1973, Paul Lauterbur (State University of New York) described a new imaging technique that he termed Zeugmatography. By utilizing gradients in the magnetic field, this technique was able to produce a two-dimensional image (back-projection). (Through analysis of the characteristics of the emitted radio waves, their origin could be determined.) Peter Mansfield further developed the utilization of gradients in the magnetic field and the mathematically analysis of these signals for a more useful imaging technique. (Paul C Lauterbur and Peter Mansfield were awarded with the 2003 Nobel Prize in Medicine.)
In 1975, Richard Ernst introduced 2D NMR using phase and frequency encoding, and the Fourier Transform. Instead of Paul Lauterbur's back-projection, he timely switched magnetic field gradients ('NMR Fourier Zeugmatography'). [This basic reconstruction method is the basis of current MRI techniques.]
1977/78: First images could be presented. A cross section through a finger by Peter Mansfield and Andrew A. Maudsley. Peter Mansfield also could present the first image through the abdomen.
In 1977, Raymond Damadian completed (after 7 years) the first MR scanner (Indomitable). In 1978, he founded the FONAR Corporation, which manufactured the first commercial MRI scanner in 1980. Fonar went public in 1981.
1981: Schering submitted a patent application for Gd-DTPA dimeglumine.
1982: The first 'magnetization-transfer' imaging by Robert N. Muller.
In 1983, Toshiba obtained approval from the Ministry of Health and Welfare in Japan for the first commercial MRI system.
In 1984, FONAR Corporation receives FDA approval for its first MRI scanner.
1986: Jürgen Hennig, A. Nauerth, and Hartmut Friedburg (University of Freiburg) introduced RARE (rapid acquisition with relaxation enhancement) imaging. Axel Haase, Jens Frahm, Dieter Matthaei, Wolfgang Haenicke, and Dietmar K. Merboldt (Max-Planck-Institute, Göttingen) developed the FLASH (fast low angle shot) sequence.
1988: Schering's MAGNEVIST gets its first approval by the FDA.
In 1991, fMRI was developed independently by the University of Minnesota's Center for Magnetic Resonance Research (CMRR) and Massachusetts General Hospital's (MGH) MR Center.
From 1992 to 1997 Fonar was paid for the infringement of it's patents from 'nearly every one of its competitors in the MRI industry including giant multi-nationals as Toshiba, Siemens, Shimadzu, Philips and GE'.
 
Images, Movies, Sliders:
 Cardiac Infarct Short Axis Cine Overview  Open this link in a new window
    

Courtesy of  Robert R. Edelman
 
spacer

• View the DATABASE results for 'MRI History' (6).Open this link in a new window


• View the NEWS results for 'MRI History' (1).Open this link in a new window.
 
Further Reading:
  Basics:
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, History & Introduction
2000   by www.cis.rit.edu    
A Short History of the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
   by www.teslasociety.com    
Fonar Our History
   by www.fonar.com    
  News & More:
Scientists win Nobels for work on MRI
Tuesday, 10 June 2003   by usatoday30.usatoday.com    
2001 Lemelson-MIT Lifetime Achievement Award Winner
   by web.mit.edu    
MRI's inside story
Thursday, 4 December 2003   by www.economist.com    
MRI Resources 
Cochlear Implant - Hospitals - Services and Supplies - Non-English - Pediatric and Fetal MRI - MRI Training Courses
 
Machine Imperfection ArtifactInfoSheet: - Artifacts - 
Case Studies, 
Reduction Index, 
etc.MRI Resource Directory:
 - Artifacts -
 
Quick Overview
Please note that there are different common names for this artifact.
Artifact Information
NAME
Machine imperfection, data error
DESCRIPTION
Striped ghosts with a shift of half the field of view
REASON
Non-uniform sampling, phase differences
HELP
Data correction
Machine imperfection-based artifacts manifest themselves due to the fact that the odd k-space lines are acquired in a different direction than the even k-space lines. Slight differences in timing result in shifts of the echo in the acquisition window. By the shift theorem, such shifts in the time domain data then produce linear phase differences in the frequency domain data.
Without correction, such phase differences in every second line produce striped ghosts with a shift of half the field of view, so-called Nyquist ghosts. Shifts in the applied magnetic field can also produce similar (but constant in amplitude) ghosts.
This artifact is commonly seen in an EPI image and can arise from both, hardware and sample imperfections.
A further source of machine-based artifact arises from the need to acquire the signal as quickly as possible. For this reason the EPI signal is often acquired during times when the gradients are being switched. Such sampling effectively means that the k-space sampling is not uniform, resulting in ringing artifacts in the image.
mri safety guidance
Image Guidance
Such artifacts can be minimized by careful setup of the spectrometer and/or correction of the data. For this reasons reference data are often collected, either as a separate scan or embedded in the imaging data. The non-uniform sampling can be removed by knowing the form of the gradient switching. It is possible to regrid the data onto a uniform k-space grid.
spacer

• View the DATABASE results for 'Machine Imperfection Artifact' (2).Open this link in a new window

 
Further Reading:
  Basics:
MRI Artifact Gallery
   by chickscope.beckman.uiuc.edu    
Searchterm 'Image' was also found in the following services: 
spacer
News  (255)  Resources  (73)  Forum  (129)  
 
Matrix Size
 
The number of data points collected in one, two or all three directions. Normally used for the 2D in plane sampling. The display matrix may be different from the acquisition matrix, although the latter determines the resolution. Measurement time may be saved by not acquiring raw data lines corresponding to high resolution. Not measured rows are filled with zeroes prior to the image calculation. A square image is the result of an interpolation in phase encoding direction. See also Zero Filling.
mri safety guidance
Image Guidance
The chosen matrix size effects scan time, resolution and SNR. Reduced measurement matrixes decrease the scan time and the resolution by increased SNR.
spacer

• View the DATABASE results for 'Matrix Size' (4).Open this link in a new window

MRI Resources 
Raman Spectroscopy - Process Analysis - Pathology - Cochlear Implant - Mass Spectrometry - Cardiovascular Imaging
 
Metal ArtifactInfoSheet: - Artifacts - 
Case Studies, 
Reduction Index, 
etc.MRI Resource Directory:
 - Artifacts -
 
Quick Overview
Artifact Information
NAME
Metal, susceptibility
DESCRIPTION
Signal dropout, bright spots
REASON
HELP
Remove the metal
Ferromagnetic metal will cause a magnetic field inhomogeneity, which in turn causes a local signal void, often accompanied by an area of high signal intensity, as well as a distortion of the image. They create their own magnetic field and dramatically alter precession frequencies of protons in the adjacent tissues. Tissues adjacent to ferromagnetic components become influenced by the induced magnetic field of the metal hardware rather than the parent field and, therefore, either fail to precess or do so at a different frequency and hence do not generate useful signal. Two components contribute to susceptibility artifact, induced magnetism in the ferromagnetic component itself and induced magnetism in protons adjacent to the component.
Artifacts from metal may have varied appearances on MRI scans due to different type of metal or configuration of the piece of metal. The biocompatibility of metallic alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome and titanium alloy is based on the presence of a constituent element within the alloy that has the ability to form an adherent oxide coating that is stable, chemically inert and hence biocompatible. In relation to imaging titanium alloys are less ferromagnetic than both cobalt and stainless steel, induce less susceptibility artifact and result in less marked image degradation.
mri safety guidance
Image Guidance
Remove the metal when possible or take a not so sensitive sequence (a SE or another sequence with a rephasing 180° pulse).

See also Susceptibility Artifact.
spacer

• View the DATABASE results for 'Metal Artifact' (2).Open this link in a new window

 
Further Reading:
  Basics:
Metal-Induced Artifacts in MRI
   by www.ajronline.org    
Metal Artefact Reduction
Thursday, 9 June 2011   by www.revisemri.com    
  News & More:
Multiacquisition with variable resonance image combination T2 (MAVRIC SL T2) for postoperative cervical spine with artificial disc replacement
Friday, 11 November 2022   by www.nature.com    
Modeling of Active Shimming of Metallic Needles for Interventional MRI
Monday, 29 June 2020   by pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov    
MRI Resources 
Safety Products - Stimulator pool - Mass Spectrometry - Brain MRI - Knee MRI - MRI Accidents
 
previous      86 - 90 (of 453)     next
Result Pages : [1 2 3 4]  [5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 ... ]
 Random Page
 
Share This Page
FacebookTwitterLinkedIn

MR-TIP    
Community   
User
Pass
Forgot your UserID/Password ?    



New acceleration techniques will :
reduce scan times 
cause artifacts 
increase expenses 
be useful if you have a lot of experience 
doesn't do much 
never heard of 

Look
      Ups





MR-TIP.com uses cookies! By browsing MR-TIP.com, you agree to our use of cookies.

Magnetic Resonance - Technology Information Portal
Member of SoftWays' Medical Imaging Group - MR-TIP • Radiology-TIP • Medical-Ultrasound-Imaging • 
Copyright © 2003 - 2024 SoftWays. All rights reserved. [ 1 December 2024]
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Advertising
 [last update: 2024-02-26 03:41:00]