 | Info
Sheets |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
 | Out-
side |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| Result: Searchterm 'Bo'
found in 285 messages |
| Result Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 |
More Results:  Database (490) News Service (696) Resources (204) |
|
|
Kelly Baker
Tue. 14 May.19,
14:50
[Start of:
'Prostate'
1 Reply]
 Category:
Protocols
|
| Prostate |
Hey everyone my site just started scanning prostates and our protocol is about 55 minutes long, is this normal?? We have a GE Signa Artist 1.5 Can anyone share their protocol and tips. Thanks
|
|  View the whole thread | Reply to this thread
(login or register first) | |
Arnold Buggins
Fri. 21 Dec.18,
11:21
[Start of:
'Deaf in one ear but MRI scan says 'everything's normal''
0 Reply]
Category:
General
|
| Deaf in one ear but MRI scan says 'everything's normal' |
(I'm not a professional user of MRI, just someone who has recently had an MRI scan and is puzzled at the result. I hope it's still OK to post here).rnrnSeveral months ago I received a violent blow to the side of my head, and ever since, I have been totally deaf in the ear on that side. Even worse, instead of hearing anything in that ear, I'm getting a constant really loud whistling sound in that ear. As you can imagine, this is causing me a great amount of distress.rnrnI was given a CT scan which showed nothing, so then I was given an MRI scan, and I recently got the result. To my great surprise (and dismay) the letter i got from the specialist said that the scan showed that 'everything was perfectly normal'. My first reaction was to phone him and ask just how I could be totally deaf in one ear if the scan showed everything was normal, but I live in the UK, and you're not even allowed to approach a specialist directly - you have to get your doctor to do this for you. In view of how overstretched our health service is here, it could be months before I can get any answers.rnrnThis is why I'm posting here. I don't know anything about MRI scanners and all the Internet searches I've done just come up with answers to things like 'are they safe?' and 'how noisy are they?'rnrnSo can anyone tell me how an MRI scan can show there's nothing wrong with me when I'm totally deaf in an ear that had nothing wrong with it before that blow to the head?rnrnAny answers will be very gratefully received.
|
| | Reply to this thread
(login or register first) | |
Milica Dragicevic
Wed. 15 Aug.18,
10:09
[Start of:
'Spacer'
0 Reply]
Category:
General
|
| Spacer |
Hi,
I am Milica, an English-Serbian translator and I am currently translating an operator manual for MRI device.
I was wondering if you could help me and explain to me a term related to the in-bore camera calibration for this device.
The sentence I am having trouble with is: Measurement position 1: with 5 spacers. More specifically, could you explain to me the term "spacer" in this context.
Thank you very much for all your help.
|
| | Reply to this thread
(login or register first) | |
lau Moon
Tue. 31 Jul.18,
02:14
[Start of:
'custom all types of coils'
0 Reply]
Category:
Coils
|
| custom all types of coils |
We are a professional large-scale manufacturer of all types of inductor coil, we can custom coil for sensor，wireless device,RF technology,rnFor the coils Features: rn1. Winding with self-bonding wire rn2. Winding different shapes as per your inquiry rn3. Meet your inquired inductance and resistance rn4. Windings are bond by a strong adhesive rnrnOur product including:air core coil,RF coil,receiver coil,wireless charge coil,transmitter coil,sensor coil,Electromagnetic Coil, miniature inductor coil,etc.rnrnAny coils inquiry pls contact me: latinolaucoil@hotmail.com
Any coils inquiry pls contact me: latinolaucoil@hotmail.com
|
| | Reply to this thread
(login or register first) | |
Ken Bellone
Thu. 7 Jun.18,
19:52
[Reply (9 of 10) to:
'ARMRIT in California?'
started by: 'James Benitez'
on Wed. 4 Jan.12]
Category:
Organisations
|
| ARMRIT in California? |
Im not a fan of anyone being overly critical of one or the other. Personally, I'm an ARRT tech certified in R and MR. I know Jim Coffin was trying to get AMRIT off the griound decades ago, and i thought "no way is this joker going to get this to fly ". That's not to say that Jim is a joker, but I knew he was one guy fighting a monopoly.
Let me say that he's done a hell of a job. He's gained more traction than I ever expected. I've known a bunch of his techs here in NY and I have a pretty positive view of them. I presently work with one and he's one of the best techs I've worked with. I'd let him scan my own wife.
On the other hand, I've been the manager of outpatient MRI at a major medical center and I wouldn't let most of the techs scan my cat.
I don't think you NEED to have a radiography background to be a good MRI Tech, but the experience from a clinical perspective has made me a far more well rounded technologist, but that's just me. I would have hired a qualified AMRIT tech, but my hospital didn't allow it. FWIW, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, one of the country's premier cancer center will hire AMRIT techs.
Ultimately, it's the individual doing the scan that makes the difference. I do think ARRT Rad Techs doing MR should get certified within a fixed period of time.....ie 6 mos-1 year. I have witnessed while lot of "button pushers".
My personal above to anyone considering a career in the field, I would go the RT route, as it is more widely accepted AND what is missed in the discussion is that you are a lot more marketable because you have the opportunity to learn and perform other modalities. There's a caveat. If AMRIT is legal in your state and they're hiring, I wouldn't hesitate to go that route. I just think that ARRT affords you more options.
Both have good and bad techs
|
| | View the whole thread | | |
| |
| | Result Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7] 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 | |
|
| |
 | Look
Ups |
| |
bottom
top
