|
Magnetic
Resonance -
Technology
Information
Portal |
Welcome to MRI Technology • |
|
|
 | Info
Sheets |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
 | Out-
side |
| | | | |
|
| | | | | |
| Result: Searchterm 'HIS'
found in 303 messages |
| Result Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 |
More Results:  Database (430) News Service (375) Resources (57) |
|
|
Michael Veesart
Tue. 23 Jan.07,
20:27
[Reply (1 of 3) to:
'visualizing corticospinal tracts'
started by: 'marleen michels'
on Wed. 22 Nov.06]
 Category:
Applications and Examinations
|
| visualizing corticospinal tracts |
I just recently found this web site otherwise I would have responded sooner. My suggestion is another web sight. It is loaded with information.
Try medcycolpaedia.com and type in whatever your seaching for. Hope this helps
|
|  View the whole thread | | |
Scott Lytle
Thu. 4 Jan.07,
17:52
[Reply (2 of 3) to:
'ETL for a STIR'
started by: 'Shaun Schofield'
on Thu. 30 Mar.06]
Category:
Sequences and Imaging Parameters
|
| ETL for a STIR |
It depends.
When Centric echo allocation is used you have higher SNR, a low TE, but more image blurring. Very similar to a PD. I prefer an echo train of less than 8 in this case.
When Sequential echo allocation is used you have lower SNR, a higher TE (I prefer less than a TE of 60), but significantly less image blurring. Very similar to a T2 or FLAIR. In this case your echo train length is governed by your TE and image blurring is not usually an issue. Depending on how short of an inter-echo time you can use, and by keeping an eye on the TE, the echo train can be as high as you want.
Hope this helps.
|
| | View the whole thread | | |
Matt B.
Wed. 3 Jan.07,
22:29
[Start of:
'ARMRIT Parenteral Procedures'
2 Replies]
Category:
General
|
| ARMRIT Parenteral Procedures |
Hi Folks,
As an ARMRIT technologist; the small clinic I work for is concerned about allowing me to contrast patients as a non-ARRT person. In Washington State, it is my understanding that RT's are legally allowed to push contrast and is common practice.
I read that ARRT now accepts MR as a primary pathway to registration, but I am concerned if I am eligible. Any advice there on the side?
It dawned on me that this may be a problem other ARMRIT's. Any tips?
Thanks a bunch!
|
| | View the whole thread | Reply to this thread
(login or register first) | |
Steven Smith
Thu. 21 Dec.06,
11:23
[Reply (1 of 3) to:
'scan matrices and steps'
started by: 'Steven Smith'
on Wed. 20 Dec.06]
Category:
General
|
| scan matrices and steps |
Ah, just to answer my own question, I'm guessing this means the scan resolution goes up in increments of 4.
|
| | View the whole thread | | |
Steven Smith
Wed. 20 Dec.06,
22:46
[Start of:
'scan matrices and steps'
2 Replies]
Category:
General
|
| scan matrices and steps |
Hello,
I've just joined this forum because I'm a Japanese-English translator and often translate MRI related material, but my knowledge is a bit patchy. I have a rather basic question. Part of a product specification goes (translated):
Scan Matrix: 64 – 1024 x 64 – 1024; 4 steps per
I assume this is 4 steps per scan, but wanted to check just in case. Also could anyone explain what is meant by steps in this context?
Thanks very much
Steven Smith
www.fwtranslations.co.uk
|
| | View the whole thread | Reply to this thread
(login or register first) |
| |
| | Result Pages : 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 [50] 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 | |
|
| |
 | Look
Ups |
| |
|
MR-TIP.com uses cookies! By browsing MR-TIP.com, you agree to our use of cookies. | | | [last update: 2024-02-26 03:41:00] |
|
|
bottom
top
