| Info Sheets |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Out- side |
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Result : Searchterm 'MR Compatibility' found in 1 term [] and 3 definitions [], (+ 2 Boolean[] results
| 1 - 5 (of 6) nextResult Pages : [1] [2] | | | | Searchterm 'MR Compatibility' was also found in the following services: | | | | |
| | |
| |
|
If a device is to be labeled MR Safe, the following information should be provided:
•
Data demonstrating that when the device is introduced or used in the MRI environment (i.e. the MRI scan room) it does not pose an increased safety risk to the patient or other personnel,
•
a scientifically-based rationale for why data are not necessary to prove the safety of the device in the MR environment (for example, a passive device made entirely of a polymer known to be nonreactive in strong magnetic fields).
If a device is to be labeled MR Compatible, the following information should be provided:
•
Data demonstrating that when the device is introduced or used in the MRI environment, it is MR safe that it performs its intended function without performance degradation, and that it does not adversely affect the function of the MRI scanner (e.g. no significant image artifacts or noise). Any image artifact or noise due to the medical device should be quantified (e.g., % volume affected, signal to noise ratio),
•
a scientifically-based rationale for why data are not necessary to prove the compatibility of the device in the MRI environment.
Test Conditions:
The static magnetic field strength ( Gauss (G) or Tesla (T)) to which the device was tested and demonstrated to be MRI 'safe', 'compatible', or 'intended for use in' should be related to typical machine ratings (e.g. 0.5 T, 1.5 T, 2.0 T, and shielded or unshielded magnet, etc).
The same conditions should be used for the spatial gradient ( field strength per unit distance (i.e., G/cm)) in which the device was tested and demonstrated to be 'safe', 'compatible', or 'intended for use in'.
Also the RF transmitter power used during testing of the device, should be related to this typical machine ratings. | | | | • For this and other aspects of MRI safety see our InfoSheet about MRI Safety. | | | • Patient-related information is collected in our MRI Patient Information.
| | | | • Share the entry 'MR Compatibility': | | | • View the NEWS results for 'MR Compatibility' (2).
| | | | Further Reading: | | Basics:
|
|
News & More:
| |
| |
| | | MRI Safety Resources | | | | |
| | | |
| |
|
| | | | • View the DATABASE results for 'MR Guided Interventions' (8).
| | | | Further Reading: | Basics:
|
|
News & More:
| |
AI analysis finds younger AFib patients benefit from MRI-guided ablation treatments Friday, 25 August 2023 by www.eurekalert.org | | |
Theranostic nano-platform for MRI-guided synergistic therapy against breast cancer Monday, 26 September 2022 by phys.org | | |
Magnetic seeds used to heat and kill cancer Tuesday, 1 February 2022 by www.sciencedaily.com | | |
What is the effect of MRI with targeted biopsies on the rate of patients discontinuing active surveillance? A reflection of the use of MRI in the PRIAS study Thursday, 8 April 2021 by www.docwirenews.com | | |
Modeling of Active Shimming of Metallic Needles for Interventional MRI Monday, 29 June 2020 by pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | | |
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Guided Confirmatory Biopsy for Initiating Active Surveillance of Prostate Cancer Wednesday, 11 September 2019 by jamanetwork.com | | |
FDA clears ViewRay's next-gen, MRI-guided radiation therapy device Tuesday, 28 February 2017 by www.fiercebiotech.com | | |
Siemens, U. of Twente Biopsy Robot Promises Greater Precision, Less Cost Friday, 22 January 2016 by www.meddeviceonline.com | | |
Magnetic resonance-guided motorized transcranial ultrasound system for blood-brain barrier permeabilization along arbitrary trajectories in rodents Thursday, 24 December 2015 by www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov | | |
New MRI-Guided Catheter Shows Major Potential for Stroke Treatment Tuesday, 29 December 2015 by www.radiology.ucsf.edu | | |
Polish study on MRI-ultrasound for targeted prostate biopsy wins CEM award Tuesday, 12 November 2013 by medicalxpress.com | | |
C4 Imaging Announces FDA 510(k) Clearance of its Positive-Signal MRI Marker - Siriusâ„¢ Friday, 6 December 2013 by www.digitaljournal.com |
|
| |
| | | | | |
| |
|
It is important to remember when working around a superconducting magnet that the magnetic field is always on. Under usual working conditions the field is never turned off. Attention must be paid to keep all ferromagnetic items at an adequate distance from the magnet. Ferromagnetic objects which came accidentally under the influence of these strong magnets can injure or kill individuals in or nearby the magnet, or can seriously damage every hardware, the magnet itself, the cooling system, etc..
See MRI resources Accidents.
The doors leading to a magnet room should be closed at all times except when entering or exiting the room. Every person working in or entering the magnet room or adjacent rooms with a magnetic field has to be instructed about the dangers. This should include the patient, intensive-care staff, and maintenance-, service- and cleaning personnel, etc..
The 5 Gauss limit defines the 'safe' level of static magnetic field exposure. The value of the absorbed dose is fixed by the authorities to avoid heating of the patient's tissue and is defined by the specific absorption rate.
Leads or wires that are used in the magnet bore during imaging procedures, should not form large-radius wire loops. Leg-to-leg and leg-to-arm skin contact should be prevented in order to avoid the risk of burning due to the generation of high current loops if the legs or arms are allowed to touch. The patient's skin should not be in contact with the inner bore of the magnet.
The outflow from cryogens like liquid helium is improbable during normal operation and not a real danger for patients.
The safety of MRI contrast agents is tested in drug trials and they have a high compatibility with very few side effects. The variations of the side effects and possible contraindications are similar to X-ray contrast medium, but very rare. In general, an adverse reaction increases with the quantity of the MRI contrast medium and also with the osmolarity of the compound.
See also 5 Gauss Fringe Field, 5 Gauss Line, Cardiac Risks, Cardiac Stent, dB/dt, Legal Requirements, Low Field MRI, Magnetohydrodynamic Effect, MR Compatibility, MR Guided Interventions, Claustrophobia, MRI Risks and Shielding. | | | | | | | | | • View the DATABASE results for 'MRI Safety' (42).
| | | • View the NEWS results for 'MRI Safety' (13).
| | | | Further Reading: | Basics:
|
|
News & More:
| |
| |
| | | Searchterm 'MR Compatibility' was also found in the following services: | | | | |
| | |
| |
|
Image Guidance
Take care to use only MR compatible (special shielded) devices.
See also MR Compatibility. | | | | | Further Reading: | News & More:
|
|
| |
| | | | | |
| |
|
Quick Overview
NAME
Metal, susceptibility
Ferromagnetic metal will cause a magnetic field inhomogeneity, which in turn causes a local signal void, often accompanied by an area of high signal intensity, as well as a distortion of the image.
They create their own magnetic field and dramatically alter precession frequencies of protons in the adjacent tissues. Tissues adjacent to ferromagnetic components become influenced by the induced magnetic field of the metal hardware rather than the parent field and, therefore, either fail to precess or do so at a different frequency and hence do not generate useful signal. Two components contribute to susceptibility artifact, induced magnetism in the ferromagnetic component itself and induced magnetism in protons adjacent to the component. Artifacts from metal may have varied appearances on MRI scans due to different type of metal or configuration of the piece of metal.
The bio compatibility of metallic alloys, stainless steel, cobalt chrome and titanium alloy is based on the presence of a constituent element within the alloy that has the ability to form an adherent oxide coating that is stable, chemically inert and hence biocompatible. In relation to imaging titanium alloys are less ferromagnetic than both cobalt and stainless steel, induce less susceptibility artifact and result in less marked image degradation.
Image Guidance
| | | | • View the DATABASE results for 'Metal Artifact' (2).
| | | | Further Reading: | Basics:
|
|
News & More:
| |
| |
| | | | |
| | 1 - 5 (of 6) nextResult Pages : [1] [2] |
| |
|
| |
| Look Ups |
| |