| Info Sheets |
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
| Out- side |
| | | | |
|
| | | | |
Result : Searchterm 'Real' found in 4 terms [] and 43 definitions []
| previous 26 - 30 (of 47) nextResult Pages : [1] [2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10] | | | | Searchterm 'Real' was also found in the following services: | | | | |
| | |
| |
|
In some cases raw data are displayable. These are typically just the real part of the complex raw data, and have been scaled to emphasize the interesting details. Therefore, they cannot be successfully transformed to reproduce the displayed images, but may help to find artifacts or the reason for bad image quality. | | | | | |
| | | Searchterm 'Real' was also found in the following services: | | | | |
| | |
| |
|
| | | | • View the DATABASE results for 'Larmor Frequency' (27).
| | | | Further Reading: | | Basics:
|
|
News & More:
| |
| |
| | | | | |
| |
|
| | | | | | • View the DATABASE results for 'Longitudinal Relaxation Time' (5).
| | | | |
| | | Searchterm 'Real' was also found in the following services: | | | | |
| | |
| |
|
From Siemens Medical Systems;
A new, powerful, compact player in MRI. For both, patients and health care professionals, the mid-field has realized a giant step to cost efficient quality care. Obese patients and people with claustrophobia appreciate the comfortable side loading. The smallest pole diameter - 137 cm (54 inches) allows for optimal patient comfort.
Device Information and Specification
CLINICAL APPLICATION
Whole body
SE, FLASH, FISP, IR, FIR, STIR, TrueIR/FISP, FSE, MT, SS-FSE, MT-SE, MTC, MSE, EPI, PSIF
IMAGING MODES
Single, multislice, volume study, multi angle, multi oblique
512 x 512 full screen display
41 cm vertical gap distance
| | | | • View the DATABASE results for 'MAGNETOM C™' (2).
| | | | Further Reading: | Basics:
|
|
| |
| | | Searchterm 'Real' was also found in the following services: | | | | |
| | |
| |
|
The subacute risks and side effects of magnetic and RF fields (for patients and staff) have been intensively examined for a long time, but there have been no long-term studies following persons who have been exposed to the static magnetic fields used in MRI. However, no permanent hazardous effects of a static magnetic field exposure upon human beings have yet been demonstrated.
Temporary possible side effects of high magnetic and RF fields:
•
Varying magnetic fields can induce so-called magnetic phosphenes that occur when an individual is subject to rapid changes of 2-5 T/s, which can produce a flashing sensation in the eyes. This temporary side effect does not seem to damage the eyes. Static field strengths used for clinical MRI examinations vary between 0.2 and 3.0 tesla;; field changes during the MRI scan vary in the dimension of mT/s. Experimental imaging units can use higher field strengths of up to 14.0 T, which are not approved for human use.
•
The Radio frequency pulses mainly produce heat, which is absorbed by the body tissue. If the power of the RF radiation is very high, the patient may be heated too much. To avoid this heating, the limit of RF exposure in MRI is up to the maximum specific absorption rate (SAR) of 4 W/kg whole body weight (can be different from country to country). For MRI safety reasons, the MRI machine starts no sequence, if the SAR limit is exceeded.
•
Very high static magnetic fields are needed to reduce the conductivity of nerves perceptibly. Augmentation of T waves is observed at fields used in standard imaging but this side effect in MRI is completely reversible upon removal from the magnet. Cardiac arrhythmia threshold is typically set to 7-10 tesla. The magnetohydrodynamic effect, which results from a voltage occurring across a vessel in a magnetic field and percolated by a saline solution such as blood, is irrelevant at the field strengths used.
The results of some animal and cellular studies suggest the possibility that electromagnetic fields may act as co-carcinogens or tumor promoters, but the data are inconclusive.
Up to 45 tesla, no important effects on enzyme systems have been observed. Neither changes in enzyme kinetics, nor orientation changes in macromolecules have been conclusively demonstrated.
There are some publications associating an increase in the incidence of leukemia with the location of buildings close to high-current power lines with extremely low-frequency (ELF) electromagnetic radiation of 50-60 Hz, and industrial exposure to electric and magnetic fields but a transposition of such effects to MRI or MRS seems unlikely.
Under consideration of the MRI safety guidelines, real dangers or risks of an exposure with common MRI field strengths up to 3 tesla as well as the RF exposure during the MRI scan, are not to be expected.
For more MRI safety information see also Nerve Conductivity,
Contraindications, Pregnancy
and Specific Absorption Rate.
See also the related poll result: ' In 2010 your scanner will probably work with a field strength of' | | | | • View the DATABASE results for 'MRI Risks' (9).
| | | • View the NEWS results for 'MRI Risks' (3).
| | | | Further Reading: | Basics:
|
|
News & More:
| |
| |
| | | | |
| | | |
|
| |
| Look Ups |
| |